Critique of any qualitative Nursing Reserch Paper Research

Critique of any qualitative Nursing Reserch - Research Paper Example One of the major motivations behind the research conducted by Walker and colleagues (2010) was the absence of predialysis guidelines and educational components that would facilitate and regulate the work and professional development of predialysis nursing in New Zealand. Walker et al (2010) opted in for qualitative method of gathering information and based their study on descriptive exploratory methodology. The sample for the study was comprised of fourteen nurses located in New Zealand, and the main criterion for the sample selection was â€Å"any nurse providing pre-dialysis education and care in New Zealand† (Walker et al, 2010, p.5). According to Walker et al (2010), the data for analysis was gathered via semi-structured interviews, which allowed interviewers to obtain in-depth description and discussion of the problem of nurse’s role in effective predialysis care. According to Marshall & Rossman (2011), the purpose of qualitative research is to gather an in-depth understanding of a problem, and its method aims to investigate the why and how of decision making, thus, the study by Walker et al (2010) corresponds to the criteria of qualitative study. During their semi-structured interviews, authors (Walker et al, 2010) opted in for c ollecting demographic data of the participants. Walker et al (2010) applied inductive approach to retrieve thematic content for the study discussion. Study’s preliminary findings were retrieved from the analysis of transcripts and were later discussed by participants’ group formed of predialysis nurses, which facilitated the formulation of themes and further analysis. As indicated by Marshall & Rossman (2011), in order to build a sold proposal the researchers has to argue that the study has the potential to contribute to theorizing and research, to policy issues and policy making. From the critical perspective, Walker et al (2010) did not

Should all states raise the high school dropout age to 18 Essay

Should all states raise the high school dropout age to 18 - Essay Example The skills become better with increased age. Hence, 18-year-old students have more life experiences that make them better citizens. They are also able to comprehend issues and act in accordance with regulations. An 18-year-old student has an enhanced maturity and cognitive capacity. Therefore, making the legal age for school dropout ensures that the society has fully equipped members to promote sustainability. Persons aged 18 years are equipped physically and mentally to enhance productivity and help in nation building. Even though, critics argue that increasing age limit amount to a violation of student rights and that it does not consider the talents. The school provides the platforms for talent development and nurturing. Schools also improve the interpersonal skills of individuals through diversity. Persons also learn to respect and appreciate other people’s cultures. However, such attributes only become better with increased age. An 18-year-old student shows good reasoning compared to the one who drops out at an early age. Therefore, all States should establish mechanisms to keep students in high schools until they reach 18 years of